Accuracy
Are the results accurate?
Yes, to my knowledge they seem accurate. I have a background in abstract algebra. So I can appreciate the utility this package provides.
Is it clear how the results were computed?
Yes, the vignette provides an explanation of what is occurring.
Compilation
Did the analytic work? (i.e. install correctly, startup correctly)
Yes, installed with no issues.
Were errors encountered when executing code according to the documentation?
In the Using the Package section of the vignette, the build.ds function is missing the argument h and the integers need to be passed as a vector. The function's usage is correct in the build.ds documentation.
Referring to vignette, in the example under access the matrix using the @ symbol, I’m guessing this should be F<- ds.frame@matrix
Ease of use
Is it clear how to use the analytic? (i.e. is the documentation clear)
For ease of use, change the name of the vignette to the exact name of package i.e vignette("FRameBuildR-Intro") should be vignette(“FRameBuildR”).
Basically, I had to manually click my files to access the vignette because I did not know its name. + No package level documentation, accessible via ?FRame.BuildR. However, this is ok since there is a vignette + For the stenier method, I would include a BIBD matrix in the package for ease of testing + Function documentation is clear
Are the visualizations/plots interpretable?
No explicit visualizations but the viewable matrices are interpretable. For example, the Equiangular Tight Frame produced by the frame.ds function is clearly described in the documentation.
Final Grade
Please provide a final grade
Outstanding package. Minor fixes are needed in the vignette to make it more consistent with the function documentation but otherwise great job. 49/50
Add the following code to your website.
For more information on customizing the embed code, read Embedding Snippets.